People freaking out that gitlab.com is considering to delete inactive free-tier repositories ... I mean what did you expect? Someone to host all your stuff for free forever?
Github will do exactly the same if that's at any point convenient to them. You are responsible for keeping your projects online/available/backed-up, if you don't have a contract with someone to do it for you.
 https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/04/gitlab_data_retention_policy/ (so far that seems to be a still just a rumor/leak? No official confirmation afaik.)
@piegames as it's only said about repos not updated for a long time, it might be a "rescue task" to place a canary into some subdirectory (e.g. .gitlab/) which just contains a last-updated-date and is pushed weekly (with a fresh date). Keeps the repo alive – though it might cause confusion concerning when the *real* content was updated last… So maybe a wiki page, or an issue (which is weekly opened and closed)? @Mehrad @Bubu
@piegames @Bubu there are quite a few things we can do, one of which is some sort or publicly accessible archiving with DOI binding to specific commits. I perhaps should add some more modification to the RFC and implementation of #FLOSSAM initiative I'm working on.
Ultimately we should have a permanent, reliable, citable storage for #academic software (and even perhaps preprints.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!